[affmage source="cj" results="1"]MAN Vaporize[/affmage]
MAN Vaporize
RedMan and Method Man BlackOut 2 Album Release Party

Global Warming scientists dispute man-made greenhouse effect

In February 2007 the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in its Fourth Assessment Report that human actions are "very likely" (ie, 90% or greater probability) the cause of global warming, by an increase of 0.75 Degrees in global average temperatures on the last 100 years indicated. This statement is the result of very tough discussions on a worldwide scale between thousands of climate scientists, whether human activity is the main cause of global warming. The results of this discussion were presented to the public in many publications, for example in Martin Durkin documentary The Great Global Warming Swindle ", presented in March 2007 on the British Channel 4 The main message of this production was that man- induced global warming is "a lie" and "the largest fraud of modern times." Martin Durkin and colleagues argue that the scientific Consensus on climate change is the product of "a multi-billion dollar worldwide industry, created by fanatically anti-industrial environmentalists, scientists from the peddling scare stories to chase funding supported and backed by complicit politicians and the media. "The documentary shows scientists, politicians, Economists, writers and others who caused skepticism about the scientific consensus on anthropogenic (man or) global warming. Some of the scientists argue against the main stream of the greenhouse gas theories, simply that it has not yet been determined whether humans are the primary cause of global warming, or if there are other natural variations responsible for this phenomenon, such as increased solar activity, cosmic rays, or variations in natural climate cycles. There is also a number of scientists in question due to the temperature records in the database as the temperature differences on the greenhouse effect are based on reasonable small (fractions of a º C). The so-called "Urban Heat Iceland" effect leads to a local warming in more populated areas, showing slightly higher Temperatures by increasing heat by cities, but generated as a global temperature rise. In any event, this argument was refuted by the IPPC, indicating that the Effect of the urban heat island on the global temperature trend is not more than 0.05 ° C (0.09 ° F) to 1990 degrees.

Other facts, which introduces the film proved to be interpreted as false or wrong. The film asserts for example, the records of atmospheric CO2 levels since 1940 show a steady rise, but during this time, the global temperature decreased until 1975, and has increased ever since. In any case, it is generally recognized that this cooling was usually in the form of aerosols (ie Pollution) is driven in the atmosphere. It is not contradictory if all this cooling radiation changes are considered. A second argument, which is easily invalidated, the impact of the so-called "solar variation theory" on global warming. According to the authors, solar activity (and with cosmic rays and heat from the sun aid cloud formation) is currently linked to an extremely high level and directly to changes in global temperature. The film argues that solar activity is far more impact on global warming than any other natural or anthropogenic activity on Earth. What the film not mentioned is that solar activity has declined in the last 30 years – at the same time as the big rise in global temperature.

But there are some statements in connection with the influence of the oceanic mass and water vapor on climate change that are difficult to refute. Water vapor makes up about 98% of greenhouse gas Volume and provides something between 40-80 percent of the natural greenhouse effect. It probably has the greatest effect on the temperature of the planet and the climatic conditions much greater than CO2. Water particles in the form of acting of clouds that reflect incoming solar heat, but the film argues that the effects of clouds can not exactly be simulated by scientists attempting to predict future weather conditions and their impact on global warming. This argument is probably correct, and it is known that water vapor is responsible for the natural warming of the surface temperature of 30-35 º C. anthropogenic greenhouse effect, after the film's argument is only about 2% of the total "natural" greenhouse effect, which corresponds to an increase from 0.6 to 0.7 º C in temperature. This estimate is slightly small compared to the results of much more sophisticated simulations (0.9 to 2.7 º C), but it's certainly one effect of the anthropogenic CO2 increase in the average Surface temperature.

An example of the complexity of climatic simulations is the prediction of future storm events considering effects of global warming. According to a recent study, published online by research meteorologist Tom Knutson in the journal Nature Geoscience and again in the New York Times (May 18, 2008), the global warming is not to blame for the jump in recent hurricanes in the Atlantic. The study predicts that by the end of the century the number of hurricanes in the Atlantic will fall by 18 percent. In the past, Knutson has concerns regarding the impact of climate change caused storms. His new paper has the potential to heat up a simmering debate among meteorologists about current and future effects of global warming in the Atlantic. And Knutson is not alone in this view. Another group of experts, are those who study hurricanes and more often skeptical about global warming, also say there is no connection between global warming and hurricane frequency. You run the recent increase to a natural cycle for several decades. According to forecasts, the number of hurricanes touching land in the U.S. and its neighbors by about 30 percent because of falling wind factors. But the biggest storms, with winds that would decrease of more than 110 km / h, only in the frequency by 8 percent. The largest decrease is for storms with winds of 39-73 miles an hour predicted (Normal tropical storms), which would reduce by 27 percent.

It is not all good news from Knutson study, however. His computer model also forecasts that "hurricanes and tropical storms will become stronger and more humid. precipitation was within 30 miles of a hurricane to jump by 37 percent and wind strength should be around 2 percent increase, "says Knutson study.

There are already critical reactions on this new publication. MIT hurricane meteorologist Kerry Emanuel claims that the Computer model used by Knutson is not adequate enough to look around and storms by Kevin Trenberth, a climate scientist from the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado, Knutson's computer model to the valuation of tropical weather and storms schlechte''nicht with any kind of loyalty to replicate.''It is not good enough, taking into account the intensity, duration and size of the storm events, is not only the number of hurricanes to assess important.

Positive feedback comes from NOAA hurricane meteorologist Chris Landsea, who praised not part of this study, Knutson work als''sehr consistent with what is being said is all together .'''' I think global warming is a major concern, but when it comes to hurricanes the evidence for change damn tiny,''Landsea said.

About the Author

Dr. Oswald J. Eppers is manager of the company E&R InterConsult and owner of the Two-Approach Job Assistant and Career Guide with daily updated job opportunities for renewable energy specialists.

Ladies …. Do you have a "certain" guy at work who?

seems to always show to impress you? Did he act like one on "Idiot receive" and your nerves? If so ………. would'nt you love it easy to vaporize him …. LOL Jerry aka poet man =)

Oh, I know how much to many of your description. I thought it would end after high school. It never ends!

[affmage source="cj" results="10"]MAN Vaporize[/affmage]